ICE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 58.22%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat CME Group's return on equity of 13.28%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.44, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $270.35 which suggests that it could fall by -4.32%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than CME Group.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.307%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. CME Group offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is lower than CME Group's net income of $956.2M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while CME Group's PE ratio is 28.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.23x versus 16.19x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 32.48%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.44, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $500.56 which suggests that it could grow by 7.72%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Moodys.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.353%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is higher than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Moodys's PE ratio is 40.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.23x versus 11.70x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 18.9%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.44, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $83.72 which suggests that it could grow by 7.08%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.022%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is higher than Nasdaq's net income of $395M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 35.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.23x versus 5.80x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 28.86%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.44, signalling upside risk potential of 10.61%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $585.87 which suggests that it could grow by 15.81%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.865%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 39.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.23x versus 10.83x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.