SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 24.5% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 57.34%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07% beat CME Group's return on equity of 12.94%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $601.86, signalling upside risk potential of 34.32%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $260.24 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than CME Group.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, which suggesting that the stock is 26.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.427, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.303%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. CME Group offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. S&P Global's net income of $880M is higher than CME Group's net income of $874.6M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.56x while CME Group's PE ratio is 26.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 9.91x versus 14.94x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 24.5% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 56.84%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $601.86, signalling upside risk potential of 34.32%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $314.12 which suggests that it could grow by 95.65%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than S&P Global, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than S&P Global.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, which suggesting that the stock is 26.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. S&P Global's net income of $880M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.56x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 9.91x versus 6.60x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 24.5% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 23.62%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.32%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $601.86, signalling upside risk potential of 34.32%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $535.58 which suggests that it could grow by 33.09%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Moodys.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, which suggesting that the stock is 26.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.384%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.7B. S&P Global's net income of $880M is higher than Moodys's net income of $395M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.56x while Moodys's PE ratio is 35.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 9.91x versus 10.37x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSCI has a net margin of 24.5% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 41.09%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07% beat MSCI's return on equity of --.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $601.86, signalling upside risk potential of 34.32%. On the other hand MSCI has an analysts' consensus of $657.21 which suggests that it could grow by 29.52%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than MSCI.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, which suggesting that the stock is 26.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSCI has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.942%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. MSCI offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. MSCI pays out 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than MSCI quarterly revenues of $743.5M. S&P Global's net income of $880M is higher than MSCI's net income of $305.5M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.56x while MSCI's PE ratio is 36.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 9.91x versus 14.03x for MSCI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.