CBOE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 56.84%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $211.93, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $318.12 which suggests that it could grow by 82.9%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cboe Global Markets's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 18.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.73x versus 7.15x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 23.04%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.29%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $211.93, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $189.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.32%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.204%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $698M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 36.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.73x versus 8.55x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 17.49%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $211.93, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $88.61 which suggests that it could grow by 18.29%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.949%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $355M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 39.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.73x versus 5.86x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 24.5%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $211.93, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $608.39 which suggests that it could grow by 21.07%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.15%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $880M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 40.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.73x versus 11.03x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.