DNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 56.84%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.85% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.5%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $277.59 which suggests that it could grow by 36.16%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $631.9M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $7.8M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 21.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.66x versus 8.38x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 19.78%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.85% beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.5%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $336.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.24%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.086%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $631.9M, which are larger than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $591M. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $7.8M is lower than Morningstar's net income of $116.9M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Morningstar's PE ratio is 32.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.66x versus 5.30x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 17.49%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.85% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.5%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $82.83 which suggests that it could grow by 10.98%. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.075%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $631.9M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $7.8M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $355M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 38.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.66x versus 5.85x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 24.5%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.85% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.5%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $581.82 which suggests that it could grow by 20.9%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.168%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $631.9M, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $7.8M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $880M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while S&P Global's PE ratio is 38.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.66x versus 10.57x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.