GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of -4.54%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 2.78%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $70.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.39%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $37.60 which suggests that it could grow by 26.29%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 68.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.4B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is higher than The Kraft Heinz's net income of -$290M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 26.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.73x versus 1.40x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of 24.03%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $70.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.39%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.55 which suggests that it could grow by 20.89%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.176%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.73x versus 5.67x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of -2.26%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $70.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.39%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $68.86 which suggests that it could grow by 11.64%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

General Mills has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.328%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 24.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.73x versus 1.41x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of 12.57%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $70.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.39%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $179.85 which suggests that it could grow by 23.69%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.305%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.73x versus 2.18x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.