GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Campbell's has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 2.67%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat The Campbell's's return on equity of 11.74%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $60.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand The Campbell's has an analysts' consensus of $38.89 which suggests that it could grow by 16.72%. Given that The Campbell's has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe The Campbell's is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's has a beta of 0.106, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.379%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. The Campbell's offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than The Campbell's quarterly revenues of $2.5B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than The Campbell's's net income of $66M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while The Campbell's's PE ratio is 22.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 0.98x for The Campbell's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kellanova has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 9.86%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $60.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand Kellanova has an analysts' consensus of $83.40 which suggests that it could grow by 3.96%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Kellanova.

General Mills has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kellanova has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.178%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Kellanova offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova pays out 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Kellanova quarterly revenues of $3.1B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Kellanova's net income of $304M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while Kellanova's PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 2.21x for Kellanova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 11.87%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $60.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 18.98%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.273%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 1.26x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 10.24%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $60.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $150.06 which suggests that it could grow by 13.42%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 98.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.381%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 1.99x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.