K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 15.19%. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat General Mills's return on equity of 27.15%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $81.02, signalling downside risk potential of -1.15%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $70.37 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.228%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. General Mills offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Kellanova's net income of $367M is lower than General Mills's net income of $795.7M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.21x versus 1.76x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WK Kellogg has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of -1.6%. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat WK Kellogg's return on equity of 23.21%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $81.02, signalling downside risk potential of -1.15%. On the other hand WK Kellogg has an analysts' consensus of $18.74 which suggests that it could grow by 6.6%. Given that WK Kellogg has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe WK Kellogg is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. WK Kellogg offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. WK Kellogg pays out 615.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WK Kellogg's is not.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than WK Kellogg quarterly revenues of $689M. Kellanova's net income of $367M is higher than WK Kellogg's net income of -$11M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while WK Kellogg's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.21x versus 0.56x for WK Kellogg. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 9.27%. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.53%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $81.02, signalling downside risk potential of -1.15%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $72.48 which suggests that it could grow by 24.27%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.539, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.116%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Kellanova's net income of $367M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $853M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 20.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.21x versus 2.18x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 3.7%. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $81.02, signalling downside risk potential of -1.15%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $103.75 which suggests that it could grow by 20.85%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.502%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Kellanova's net income of $367M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 21.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.21x versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.