CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Campbell Soup has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 7.86%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat Campbell Soup's return on equity of 14.38%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.54, signalling upside risk potential of 10.91%. On the other hand Campbell Soup has an analysts' consensus of $49.11 which suggests that it could grow by 22.92%. Given that Campbell Soup has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Campbell Soup is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.289, which suggesting that the stock is 71.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.194, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.559%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Campbell Soup offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Campbell Soup pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Campbell Soup's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Campbell Soup quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than Campbell Soup's net income of $218M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while Campbell Soup's PE ratio is 21.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.21x for Campbell Soup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 15.19%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat General Mills's return on equity of 27.15%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.54, signalling upside risk potential of 10.91%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $70.87 which suggests that it could grow by 16.39%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.289, which suggesting that the stock is 71.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.228%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. General Mills offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is lower than General Mills's net income of $795.7M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.73x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -2.26%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.54, signalling upside risk potential of 10.91%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $68.86 which suggests that it could grow by 11.64%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.289, which suggesting that the stock is 71.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.328%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 24.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.41x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -1.08%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of 6.97%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.54, signalling upside risk potential of 10.91%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $126.49 which suggests that it could grow by 17.7%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.289, which suggesting that the stock is 71.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.09%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$24.5M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 21.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.30x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.