LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 8.9%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.09%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $29.54 which suggests that it could grow by 11.03%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.289, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.127%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 26.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.39x versus 1.07x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 15.19%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat General Mills's return on equity of 27.15%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.09%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $70.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.91%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.228%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. General Mills offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than General Mills's net income of $795.7M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.39x versus 1.74x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 9.58%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 17.43%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.09%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.44%. Given that Lancaster Colony has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Lancaster Colony is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.361, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.879%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $466.6M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than Lancaster Colony's net income of $44.7M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 29.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.39x versus 2.48x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 4.06%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.24%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.09%. On the other hand Post Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $128.80 which suggests that it could grow by 19.74%. Given that Post Holdings has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Post Holdings is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings has a beta of 0.671, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.886%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Post Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Post Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than Post Holdings's net income of $81.6M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.07x while Post Holdings's PE ratio is 19.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.39x versus 0.91x for Post Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.