CHMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of 5.67%. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74%.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.19%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Next-ChemX, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Next-ChemX.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 109.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.479%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 5.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $97M. Next-ChemX's net income of -$465.9K is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 14.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 0.78x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of 2.05%. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.09%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Next-ChemX, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Next-ChemX.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 109.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.653%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Next-ChemX's net income of -$465.9K is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 0.14x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of --. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Next-ChemX has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Next-ChemX is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 109.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 554.533%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Next-ChemX's net income of -$465.9K is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 0.02x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of -0.71%. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $32.26 which suggests that it could grow by 15.33%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Next-ChemX, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Next-ChemX.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 109.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Next-ChemX's net income of -$465.9K is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 1.42x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.