LXFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of 5.54%. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.19%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.127, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.265%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $97M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.78x versus 0.51x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of 2.05%. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.19%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.09%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.653%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $97M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.78x versus 0.14x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.19%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 554.533%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $97M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.78x versus 0.02x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of -0.71%. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.19%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $32.26 which suggests that it could grow by 15.33%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Symbotic.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $97M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.78x versus 1.42x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.