PKOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of 5.54%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.376%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 0.43x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of 5.67%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.8%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.058%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $97M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 0.80x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.445, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 544.532%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 0.01x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of -0.71%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $31.95 which suggests that it could grow by 4.02%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 1.56x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.