Financhill
Sell
33

CVR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$11.21
Seasonality move :
-0.71%
Day range:
$11.21 - $11.25
52-week range:
$8.15 - $22.27
Dividend yield:
2.32%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.40x
P/B ratio:
0.54x
Volume:
3.1K
Avg. volume:
7.1K
1-year change:
-31.02%
Market cap:
$10.8M
Revenue:
$27M
EPS (TTM):
-$3.67

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -- -- -- --
ACTG
Acacia Research
$55M -$0.05 112.87% -37.5% $6.00
HI
Hillenbrand
$691M $0.54 -27.34% 497.78% $31.25
NPO
Enpro
$266.2M $1.67 4.39% 65.09% $212.33
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$425.5M $0.84 -3.02% -5.98% --
SYM
Symbotic
$522.4M $0.05 13.68% -- $31.95
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$11.21 -- $10.8M -- $0.03 2.32% 0.40x
ACTG
Acacia Research
$3.88 $6.00 $373.1M 6.84x $0.00 0% 1.72x
HI
Hillenbrand
$23.12 $31.25 $1.6B 34.24x $0.23 3.87% 0.54x
NPO
Enpro
$186.50 $212.33 $3.9B 46.39x $0.31 0.65% 3.70x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$19.99 -- $284.4M 8.73x $0.13 2.5% 0.16x
SYM
Symbotic
$26.70 $31.95 $2.9B -- $0.00 0% 1.35x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- 0.998 -- 2.68x
ACTG
Acacia Research
16.71% 1.774 31.44% 5.60x
HI
Hillenbrand
59.09% 2.063 110.46% 1.00x
NPO
Enpro
30.33% 2.423 18.69% 2.09x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
65.04% 1.943 207.54% 0.92x
SYM
Symbotic
-- 1.007 -- 0.85x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$695K -$823.6K -13.89% -13.89% -11.82% -$368.9K
ACTG
Acacia Research
$58.9M $38.3M -1.77% -2% 25.77% $335K
HI
Hillenbrand
$236.4M $33.5M -7.78% -18.26% -2.95% -$8M
NPO
Enpro
$118.2M $41.8M 4.06% 5.9% 15.19% $11.6M
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$68.1M $19.9M 3.1% 9.33% 5.11% -$19.5M
SYM
Symbotic
$107.8M -$32.1M -2.31% -2.31% -5.83% $249M

Chicago Rivet & Machine vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or ACTG?

    Acacia Research has a net margin of -20.76% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of 19.52%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89% beat Acacia Research's return on equity of -2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
    ACTG
    Acacia Research
    47.37% $0.25 $685.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or ACTG?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Acacia Research has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.64%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
    ACTG
    Acacia Research
    1 0 0
  • Is CVR or ACTG More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acacia Research has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.636%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or ACTG?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Acacia Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Acacia Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or ACTG?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Acacia Research quarterly revenues of $124.4M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Acacia Research's net income of $24.3M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acacia Research's PE ratio is 6.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.40x versus 1.72x for Acacia Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.40x -- $7M -$1.4M
    ACTG
    Acacia Research
    1.72x 6.84x $124.4M $24.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or HI?

    Hillenbrand has a net margin of -20.76% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of -5.71%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
    HI
    Hillenbrand
    33.02% -$0.58 $3.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or HI?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $31.25 which suggests that it could grow by 35.16%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
    HI
    Hillenbrand
    2 2 0
  • Is CVR or HI More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.94%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or HI?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or HI?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $715.9M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 34.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.40x versus 0.54x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.40x -- $7M -$1.4M
    HI
    Hillenbrand
    0.54x 34.24x $715.9M -$40.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or NPO?

    Enpro has a net margin of -20.76% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of 8.97%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89% beat Enpro's return on equity of 5.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
    NPO
    Enpro
    43.27% $1.15 $2.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or NPO?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enpro has an analysts' consensus of $212.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
    NPO
    Enpro
    3 0 0
  • Is CVR or NPO More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or NPO?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Enpro offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro pays out 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or NPO?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Enpro quarterly revenues of $273.2M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Enpro's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enpro's PE ratio is 46.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.40x versus 3.70x for Enpro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.40x -- $7M -$1.4M
    NPO
    Enpro
    3.70x 46.39x $273.2M $24.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or PKOH?

    Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -20.76% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of 2.05%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    16.8% $0.60 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or PKOH?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -22.46%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    0 1 0
  • Is CVR or PKOH More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.575%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or PKOH?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or PKOH?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 8.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.40x versus 0.16x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.40x -- $7M -$1.4M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    0.16x 8.73x $405.4M $8.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or SYM?

    Symbotic has a net margin of -20.76% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of -0.71%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
    SYM
    Symbotic
    19.62% -$0.04 $421.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or SYM?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $31.95 which suggests that it could grow by 18.01%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
    SYM
    Symbotic
    9 7 1
  • Is CVR or SYM More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or SYM?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or SYM?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.40x versus 1.35x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.40x -- $7M -$1.4M
    SYM
    Symbotic
    1.35x -- $549.7M -$3.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

What Stocks Are Recession-Proof?
What Stocks Are Recession-Proof?

Fears of a recession prevailed in Q2 2025 when the…

Which Stocks Are Recession-Proof?
Which Stocks Are Recession-Proof?

Fears of a recession prevailed in Q2 2025 when the…

Is Gartner a Safe Stock to Own?
Is Gartner a Safe Stock to Own?

Gartner (NYSE:IT) is among the world’s largest consulting, research and…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 44x

Alerts

Buy
57
RGC alert for May 14

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 31.81% over the past day.

Buy
54
HALO alert for May 14

Halozyme Therapeutics [HALO] is down 24.57% over the past day.

Buy
91
COIN alert for May 14

Coinbase Global [COIN] is up 24.64% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock