HI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 5.54%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $31.25, signalling upside risk potential of 58.07%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.559, which suggesting that the stock is 55.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.376%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.46x versus 0.45x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 19.91%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $31.25, signalling upside risk potential of 58.07%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $230.28 which suggests that it could fall by -5.68%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.559, which suggesting that the stock is 55.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.227%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 37.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.46x versus 6.70x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 2.05%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $31.25, signalling upside risk potential of 58.07%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.13%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.559, which suggesting that the stock is 55.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.575%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.46x versus 0.15x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of -0.71%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $31.25, signalling upside risk potential of 58.07%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $31.95 which suggests that it could grow by 10.38%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Symbotic.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.559, which suggesting that the stock is 55.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are larger than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.46x versus 1.47x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.