CGMBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Highest Performances Holdings has a net margin of 23.2% compared to China Minsheng Banking's net margin of --. China Minsheng Banking's return on equity of 5.13% beat Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5%.

China Minsheng Banking has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highest Performances Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Minsheng Banking has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe China Minsheng Banking is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

China Minsheng Banking has a beta of -0.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.289, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.932%.

China Minsheng Banking has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.84%. Highest Performances Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Minsheng Banking pays 89.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Highest Performances Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Minsheng Banking quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Minsheng Banking's net income of $1.1B is higher than Highest Performances Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Minsheng Banking's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.00x while Highest Performances Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Minsheng Banking is 1.09x versus 0.25x for Highest Performances Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of 23.2% compared to China Minsheng Banking's net margin of --. China Minsheng Banking's return on equity of 5.13% beat The9's return on equity of --.

China Minsheng Banking has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Minsheng Banking has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe China Minsheng Banking is more attractive than The9.

China Minsheng Banking has a beta of -0.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.461%.

China Minsheng Banking has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.84%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Minsheng Banking pays 89.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Minsheng Banking quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. China Minsheng Banking's net income of $1.1B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, China Minsheng Banking's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.00x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Minsheng Banking is 1.09x versus 2.75x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 23.2% compared to China Minsheng Banking's net margin of 17.57%. China Minsheng Banking's return on equity of 5.13% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

China Minsheng Banking has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $8.03 which suggests that it could grow by 18.61%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking.

China Minsheng Banking has a beta of -0.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.314% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.894%.

China Minsheng Banking has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.84%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Minsheng Banking pays 89.8% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Minsheng Banking quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. China Minsheng Banking's net income of $1.1B is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, China Minsheng Banking's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.00x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 37.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Minsheng Banking is 1.09x versus 3.24x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.