AIFU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of --. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)'s return on equity of --.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 100.67%. On the other hand Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED), analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED).

AIFU has a beta of 6.298, which suggesting that the stock is 529.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.416%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are larger than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) quarterly revenues of --. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is higher than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)'s net income of --. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.42x while Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 13.03x versus 0.04x for Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of --. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 100.67%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

AIFU has a beta of 6.298, which suggesting that the stock is 529.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.42x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 13.03x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of 13.86%. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 12.65%.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 100.67%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.55 which suggests that it could grow by 64.49%. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than LexinFintech Holdings, analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than LexinFintech Holdings.

AIFU has a beta of 6.298, which suggesting that the stock is 529.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.169%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $426.7M. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $59.2M. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.42x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 6.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 13.03x versus 0.62x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of --. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat The9's return on equity of --.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 100.67%. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than The9.

AIFU has a beta of 6.298, which suggesting that the stock is 529.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 1.820, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.998%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.42x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 13.03x versus 2.51x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.