HPH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huize Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Highest Performances Holdings's net margin of 5.05%. Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5% beat Huize Holding's return on equity of 4.94%.

Highest Performances Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huize Holding has an analysts' consensus of $7.19 which suggests that it could grow by 85.79%. Given that Huize Holding has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe Huize Holding is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.289, which suggesting that the stock is 128.932% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huize Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Highest Performances Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huize Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highest Performances Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huize Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Huize Holding quarterly revenues of $51.6M. Highest Performances Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Huize Holding's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Highest Performances Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Huize Holding's PE ratio is 8.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highest Performances Holdings is 0.40x versus 0.21x for Huize Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of -- compared to Highest Performances Holdings's net margin of --. Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5% beat The9's return on equity of --.

Highest Performances Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highest Performances Holdings has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Highest Performances Holdings is more attractive than The9.

Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.289, which suggesting that the stock is 128.932% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.461%.

Highest Performances Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highest Performances Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Highest Performances Holdings's net income of -- is lower than The9's net income of --. Notably, Highest Performances Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highest Performances Holdings is 0.40x versus 2.72x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Highest Performances Holdings's net margin of 17.57%. Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

Highest Performances Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $8.03 which suggests that it could grow by 21.12%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.289, which suggesting that the stock is 128.932% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.894%.

Highest Performances Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highest Performances Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. Highest Performances Holdings's net income of -- is lower than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Highest Performances Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 36.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highest Performances Holdings is 0.40x versus 3.17x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.