TRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 3.93% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 5.85%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 13.42% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 10.55%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.9%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than Greenbrier Companies, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than Greenbrier Companies.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.543, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.295%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Trinity Industries pays 81.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $798.8M, which are smaller than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Trinity Industries's net income of $31.4M is lower than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $61.6M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.53x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.93x versus 0.57x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FreightCar America has a net margin of 3.93% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of -94.52%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 13.42% beat FreightCar America's return on equity of --.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand FreightCar America has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.69%. Given that FreightCar America has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe FreightCar America is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FreightCar America has a beta of 1.958, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.826%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. FreightCar America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinity Industries pays 81.13% of its earnings as a dividend. FreightCar America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $798.8M, which are larger than FreightCar America quarterly revenues of $113.3M. Trinity Industries's net income of $31.4M is higher than FreightCar America's net income of -$107M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.53x while FreightCar America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.93x versus 0.57x for FreightCar America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 3.93% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 10.63%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 13.42% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.14%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $169.53 which suggests that it could grow by 13.42%. Given that Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.91%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Trinity Industries pays 81.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $798.8M, which are smaller than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Trinity Industries's net income of $31.4M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $283M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.53x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 31.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.93x versus 3.26x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 3.93% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of -71.15%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 13.42% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -49.14%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 1.56%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $21.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.58%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.891%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Wabash National offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Trinity Industries pays 81.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out 6.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $798.8M, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $464M. Trinity Industries's net income of $31.4M is higher than Wabash National's net income of -$330.2M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.53x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.93x versus 0.37x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.