TPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mattel has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -4.88%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $88.47, signalling upside risk potential of 12.79%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.58 which suggests that it could grow by 21.59%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.64x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.59x versus 1.21x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -7.64%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Peloton Interactive's return on equity of --.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $88.47, signalling upside risk potential of 12.79%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $8.86 which suggests that it could grow by 24.03%. Given that Peloton Interactive has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Peloton Interactive is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.428%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Peloton Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Peloton Interactive quarterly revenues of $624M. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is higher than Peloton Interactive's net income of -$47.7M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.64x while Peloton Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.59x versus 1.08x for Peloton Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -43.95%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $88.47, signalling upside risk potential of 12.79%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could fall by -1.86%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.64x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.59x versus 3.15x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 2.12%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $88.47, signalling upside risk potential of 12.79%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -16.48%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Tesla.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.64x while Tesla's PE ratio is 196.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.59x versus 13.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.