TPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 18.48%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.48%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $68.25, signalling downside risk potential of -4.39%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $208.56 which suggests that it could fall by -0.64%. Given that Tapestry has more downside risk than Deckers Outdoor, analysts believe Deckers Outdoor is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.075%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is lower than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $242.3M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 36.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 6.94x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -125.86%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $68.25, signalling downside risk potential of -4.39%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.11 which suggests that it could grow by 6.31%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 3.09x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 8.57%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.02%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $68.25, signalling downside risk potential of -4.39%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $238.31 which suggests that it could fall by -0.9%. Given that Tapestry has more downside risk than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Ralph Lauren is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.851%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is higher than Ralph Lauren's net income of $147.9M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 2.32x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 8.61%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $68.25, signalling downside risk potential of -4.39%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.53 which suggests that it could fall by -28.6%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Tapestry, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Tesla.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Tesla's PE ratio is 116.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 15.32x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.