Financhill
Buy
54

PUMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$6.65
Seasonality move :
-8.76%
Day range:
$6.46 - $6.89
52-week range:
$4.61 - $11.17
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
26.47x
P/S ratio:
0.50x
P/B ratio:
0.84x
Volume:
2.8M
Avg. volume:
1.4M
1-year change:
-19.13%
Market cap:
$698.3M
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.43

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$344.3M $0.06 -7.24% -69.39% $8.72
BKR
Baker Hughes
$6.5B $0.47 -6.79% -4.26% $46.44
HAL
Halliburton
$5.3B $0.60 -6.91% -29.02% $28.93
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
$160.8M -$0.86 -9.27% -26.53% $5.00
NEXT
NextDecade
-- -$0.07 -- -92.86% $9.50
SLB
Schlumberger
$8.6B $0.73 -6.87% -1.17% $47.29
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$6.72 $8.72 $698.3M 26.47x $0.00 0% 0.50x
BKR
Baker Hughes
$39.60 $46.44 $39.2B 13.52x $0.23 2.22% 1.42x
HAL
Halliburton
$22.46 $28.93 $19.3B 9.40x $0.17 3.03% 0.87x
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
$2.84 $5.00 $49.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.07x
NEXT
NextDecade
$8.39 $9.50 $2.2B -- $0.00 0% --
SLB
Schlumberger
$36.08 $47.29 $48.7B 12.23x $0.29 3.1% 1.42x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
5.16% 1.724 5.9% 1.31x
BKR
Baker Hughes
26.12% 1.471 13.79% 0.79x
HAL
Halliburton
42.11% 1.025 34.46% 1.20x
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
111.35% 3.495 423.7% 1.05x
NEXT
NextDecade
-- 1.043 -- --
SLB
Schlumberger
41.78% 0.912 24.8% 0.83x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$46.9M $19.2M -15.85% -16.65% 3.46% $13.8M
BKR
Baker Hughes
$1.5B $752M 13.08% 17.87% 9.52% $409M
HAL
Halliburton
$879M $787M 11.79% 20.56% 7.7% $75M
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
$30.2M -$16.5M -21.07% -460.87% -11.3% -$52.6M
NEXT
NextDecade
-$3.1M -$51.9M -- -- -- -$838.8M
SLB
Schlumberger
$1.6B $1.3B 12.01% 19.04% 14.25% $211M

ProPetro Holding vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or BKR?

    Baker Hughes has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 6.26%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    22.95% $0.40 $23.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or BKR?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 29.8%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $46.44 which suggests that it could grow by 17.27%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    12 5 0
  • Is PUMP or BKR More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.168, which suggesting that the stock is 16.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.549%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or BKR?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or BKR?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 13.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 1.42x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    1.42x 13.52x $6.4B $402M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or HAL?

    Halliburton has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 3.77%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    HAL
    Halliburton
    16.23% $0.24 $18B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or HAL?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 29.8%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $28.93 which suggests that it could grow by 25.73%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Halliburton.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    HAL
    Halliburton
    12 9 0
  • Is PUMP or HAL More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.168, which suggesting that the stock is 16.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.62%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or HAL?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or HAL?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 0.87x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    HAL
    Halliburton
    0.87x 9.40x $5.4B $204M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or KLXE?

    KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -18.12%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings
    19.61% -$1.62 $234.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or KLXE?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 29.8%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 76.06%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than ProPetro Holding, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than ProPetro Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is PUMP or KLXE More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.168, which suggesting that the stock is 16.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.897%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or KLXE?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or KLXE?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are larger than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $154M. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$27.9M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 0.07x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings
    0.07x -- $154M -$27.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or NEXT?

    NextDecade has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of --. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    NEXT
    NextDecade
    -- -$0.34 --
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or NEXT?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 29.8%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.23%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than NextDecade.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    NEXT
    NextDecade
    0 1 0
  • Is PUMP or NEXT More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.168, which suggesting that the stock is 16.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.079%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or NEXT?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or NEXT?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    NEXT
    NextDecade
    -- -- -- -$88.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or SLB?

    Schlumberger has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 9.39%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    SLB
    Schlumberger
    18.92% $0.58 $34.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or SLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 29.8%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $47.29 which suggests that it could grow by 31.07%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than ProPetro Holding, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than ProPetro Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    SLB
    Schlumberger
    17 4 0
  • Is PUMP or SLB More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.168, which suggesting that the stock is 16.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.515%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or SLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or SLB?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $8.5B. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $797M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 12.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 1.42x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    SLB
    Schlumberger
    1.42x 12.23x $8.5B $797M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

AMC Stock Forecast, How High Could It Go in 2025 and Beyond?
AMC Stock Forecast, How High Could It Go in 2025 and Beyond?

AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) has been rising lately after years of…

Where Will Reddit Stock Be In 5 Years?
Where Will Reddit Stock Be In 5 Years?

On a wet March morning last year, the famously orange…

Will Palantir Crash?
Will Palantir Crash?

AI and data analytics software major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has been…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Sell
47
RGC alert for Jun 18

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 18.36% over the past day.

Sell
20
ENPH alert for Jun 18

Enphase Energy [ENPH] is up 4.18% over the past day.

Sell
26
FSLR alert for Jun 18

First Solar [FSLR] is down 0.18% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock