Financhill
Sell
34

PUMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$5.43
Seasonality move :
12.53%
Day range:
$5.11 - $5.36
52-week range:
$4.61 - $11.17
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
26.47x
P/S ratio:
0.38x
P/B ratio:
0.66x
Volume:
1.3M
Avg. volume:
1.8M
1-year change:
-36.47%
Market cap:
$535.4M
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.34

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$344.3M $0.06 -16.59% -60.19% $10.06
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$495.7M -$0.32 -14.71% -45.87% $7.10
CLB
Core Laboratories
$124.8M $0.15 -0.59% 7.02% $17.50
HAL
Halliburton
$5.3B $0.60 -6.66% -21.14% $32.01
USEG
US Energy
$3.5M -$0.05 -35% -86.84% $2.92
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$5.19 $10.06 $535.4M 26.47x $0.00 0% 0.38x
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$4.52 $7.10 $724M 8.77x $0.00 0% 0.33x
CLB
Core Laboratories
$12.32 $17.50 $576.9M 18.67x $0.01 0.33% 1.12x
HAL
Halliburton
$21.43 $32.01 $18.5B 7.57x $0.17 3.17% 0.82x
USEG
US Energy
$1.13 $2.92 $38.2M -- $0.02 0% 1.46x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
5.23% 0.861 4.68% 1.14x
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
52.41% 2.735 84.5% 0.52x
CLB
Core Laboratories
33.35% 1.398 15.45% 1.50x
HAL
Halliburton
41.79% 0.738 31.9% 1.28x
USEG
US Energy
-- 2.839 -- 0.77x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$29.4M $2.5M -14.22% -14.92% -5.78% $10M
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$3.8M -$44.2M -9.28% -17.93% -9.9% $13.3M
CLB
Core Laboratories
$19.4M $10.6M 7.99% 12.8% 10.97% $16.2M
HAL
Halliburton
$1B $932M 14.19% 24.98% 16.08% $1B
USEG
US Energy
$222K -$1.8M -65.26% -71.41% -279.6% -$902K

ProPetro Holding vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or ACDC?

    ProFrac Holding has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -23.09%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat ProFrac Holding's return on equity of -17.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0.84% -$0.66 $2.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.06, signalling upside risk potential of 93.75%. On the other hand ProFrac Holding has an analysts' consensus of $7.10 which suggests that it could grow by 57.08%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than ProFrac Holding, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than ProFrac Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0 4 1
  • Is PUMP or ACDC More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.579, which suggesting that the stock is 57.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProFrac Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProFrac Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProFrac Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are smaller than ProFrac Holding quarterly revenues of $454.7M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is higher than ProFrac Holding's net income of -$105M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while ProFrac Holding's PE ratio is 8.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.38x versus 0.33x for ProFrac Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.38x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0.33x 8.77x $454.7M -$105M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or CLB?

    Core Laboratories has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 5.73%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 12.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    CLB
    Core Laboratories
    14.99% $0.15 $383.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or CLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.06, signalling upside risk potential of 93.75%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 42.05%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Core Laboratories.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    CLB
    Core Laboratories
    0 4 0
  • Is PUMP or CLB More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.579, which suggesting that the stock is 57.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 1.994, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.433%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or CLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or CLB?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $129.2M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Core Laboratories's net income of $7.4M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 18.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.38x versus 1.12x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.38x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    CLB
    Core Laboratories
    1.12x 18.67x $129.2M $7.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or HAL?

    Halliburton has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 10.96%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    HAL
    Halliburton
    18.29% $0.70 $18.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or HAL?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.06, signalling upside risk potential of 93.75%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $32.01 which suggests that it could grow by 49.36%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Halliburton.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    HAL
    Halliburton
    13 8 0
  • Is PUMP or HAL More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.579, which suggesting that the stock is 57.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or HAL?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or HAL?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 7.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.38x versus 0.82x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.38x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    HAL
    Halliburton
    0.82x 7.57x $5.6B $615M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or USEG?

    US Energy has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -284.64%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat US Energy's return on equity of -71.41%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    USEG
    US Energy
    5.25% -$0.44 $23.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or USEG?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.06, signalling upside risk potential of 93.75%. On the other hand US Energy has an analysts' consensus of $2.92 which suggests that it could grow by 158.11%. Given that US Energy has higher upside potential than ProPetro Holding, analysts believe US Energy is more attractive than ProPetro Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    USEG
    US Energy
    1 0 0
  • Is PUMP or USEG More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.579, which suggesting that the stock is 57.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Energy has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.568%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or USEG?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or USEG?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are larger than US Energy quarterly revenues of $4.2M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than US Energy's net income of -$12M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while US Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.38x versus 1.46x for US Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.38x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    USEG
    US Energy
    1.46x -- $4.2M -$12M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Micron a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Is Micron a Good Stock to Buy Now?

Like most of its peers in the semiconductor industry, Micron…

Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?
Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?

After posting massive losses quarter after quarter for years, Uber…

How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?
How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?

YieldMax’s MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is a high-yield…

Stock Ideas

Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x

Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.5T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
91
TORXF alert for Apr 17

Torex Gold Resources [TORXF] is down 2.41% over the past day.

Sell
25
BULZ alert for Apr 17

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innov 3X Levd ETN [BULZ] is down 0.85% over the past day.

Sell
44
VIST alert for Apr 17

Vista Energy SAB de CV [VIST] is up 7.87% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock