Financhill
Buy
58

PARR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$21.59
Seasonality move :
5.34%
Day range:
$21.34 - $22.55
52-week range:
$11.86 - $27.45
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
2.70x
P/S ratio:
0.16x
P/B ratio:
1.00x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
-18.03%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$8B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.13

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings
$1.5B -$0.79 -25.72% 23.34% $22.00
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels
$98M -$0.20 -3.29% -9.53% $4.19
DINO
HF Sinclair
$6.8B -$0.41 -11.72% 19.78% $42.82
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
IEP
Icahn Enterprises LP
$2.6B $0.17 -6.35% -- $12.00
PSX
Phillips 66
$32.1B -$0.72 -13.13% -30.97% $130.97
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings
$21.59 $22.00 $1.1B 2.70x $0.00 0% 0.16x
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels
$1.79 $4.19 $395.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.96x
DINO
HF Sinclair
$36.13 $42.82 $6.8B 39.04x $0.50 5.54% 0.25x
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
$5.82 -- $74.5M 13.06x $0.00 0% 0.65x
IEP
Icahn Enterprises LP
$8.30 $12.00 $4.5B -- $0.50 30.12% 0.42x
PSX
Phillips 66
$113.48 $130.97 $46.2B 25.85x $1.20 4.1% 0.34x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings
50.92% 0.302 154.66% 0.50x
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels
31.28% 4.612 76.95% 2.32x
DINO
HF Sinclair
22.56% 1.295 42.74% 0.72x
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
-- 0.034 -- 3.60x
IEP
Icahn Enterprises LP
100% 0.630 101.34% 2.04x
PSX
Phillips 66
40.81% 1.209 36.58% 0.79x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings
$149.1M -$23.3M -2.69% -4.89% -0.89% -$42.3M
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels
-$34.5M -$62M -20.63% -28.41% -125.7% $4.8M
DINO
HF Sinclair
$190M $81M -1.15% -1.46% 0.75% -$175M
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
$1.7M -$10.3M -11.85% -11.85% -54.82% -$3.6M
IEP
Icahn Enterprises LP
$154M -$198M -9.19% -17.13% -24.24% -$270M
PSX
Phillips 66
$2B -$395M 3.76% 6.28% 2.9% -$236M

Par Pacific Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PARR or CLNE?

    Clean Energy Fuels has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -130.07%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -28.41%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    8.54% -$0.57 $2.3B
    CLNE
    Clean Energy Fuels
    -33.25% -$0.60 $874.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About PARR or CLNE?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.88%. On the other hand Clean Energy Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.19 which suggests that it could grow by 134.02%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    1 4 0
    CLNE
    Clean Energy Fuels
    6 1 0
  • Is PARR or CLNE More Risky?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.992%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PARR or CLNE?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clean Energy Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clean Energy Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PARR or CLNE?

    Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues of $103.8M. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is higher than Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$135M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Clean Energy Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.96x for Clean Energy Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    0.16x 2.70x $1.7B -$30.4M
    CLNE
    Clean Energy Fuels
    0.96x -- $103.8M -$135M
  • Which has Higher Returns PARR or DINO?

    HF Sinclair has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -0.06%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    8.54% -$0.57 $2.3B
    DINO
    HF Sinclair
    2.98% -$0.02 $11.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About PARR or DINO?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.88%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $42.82 which suggests that it could grow by 18.51%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    1 4 0
    DINO
    HF Sinclair
    4 7 0
  • Is PARR or DINO More Risky?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.806%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PARR or DINO?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PARR or DINO?

    Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is lower than HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 39.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.25x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    0.16x 2.70x $1.7B -$30.4M
    DINO
    HF Sinclair
    0.25x 39.04x $6.4B -$4M
  • Which has Higher Returns PARR or GEOS?

    Geospace Technologies has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -54.36%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -11.85%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    8.54% -$0.57 $2.3B
    GEOS
    Geospace Technologies
    9.7% -$0.77 $133.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About PARR or GEOS?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.88%. On the other hand Geospace Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    1 4 0
    GEOS
    Geospace Technologies
    0 0 0
  • Is PARR or GEOS More Risky?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.277, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.253%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PARR or GEOS?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Geospace Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geospace Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PARR or GEOS?

    Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues of $18M. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is lower than Geospace Technologies's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Geospace Technologies's PE ratio is 13.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.65x for Geospace Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    0.16x 2.70x $1.7B -$30.4M
    GEOS
    Geospace Technologies
    0.65x 13.06x $18M -$9.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns PARR or IEP?

    Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -19.45%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -17.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    8.54% -$0.57 $2.3B
    IEP
    Icahn Enterprises LP
    7.1% -$0.79 $8.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About PARR or IEP?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.88%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.58%. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    1 4 0
    IEP
    Icahn Enterprises LP
    1 0 0
  • Is PARR or IEP More Risky?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.479%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PARR or IEP?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 30.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PARR or IEP?

    Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is higher than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$422M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.42x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    0.16x 2.70x $1.7B -$30.4M
    IEP
    Icahn Enterprises LP
    0.42x -- $2.2B -$422M
  • Which has Higher Returns PARR or PSX?

    Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 1.6%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    8.54% -$0.57 $2.3B
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PARR or PSX?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.88%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $130.97 which suggests that it could grow by 15.41%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    1 4 0
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 8 0
  • Is PARR or PSX More Risky?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PARR or PSX?

    Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PARR or PSX?

    Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.34x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PARR
    Par Pacific Holdings
    0.16x 2.70x $1.7B -$30.4M
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.34x 25.85x $30.4B $487M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…

Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?

Asana stock hasn’t given many investors on Wall Street any…

Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?

So you’re looking at Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) and wondering, “Is…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31

Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock