CLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of -27.59% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of -3.91%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -11.4% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.39%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.73, signalling upside risk potential of 336.87%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 65.38%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Icahn Enterprises LP, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Icahn Enterprises LP.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.485, which suggesting that the stock is 148.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.770, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.01%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 33.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $109.3M, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$30.2M is higher than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$98M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.83x versus 0.43x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oil States International has a net margin of -27.59% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of 9.21%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -11.4% beat Oil States International's return on equity of -1.63%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.73, signalling upside risk potential of 336.87%. On the other hand Oil States International has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 29.81%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Oil States International, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Oil States International.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.485, which suggesting that the stock is 148.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oil States International has a beta of 2.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.372%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oil States International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oil States International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $109.3M, which are smaller than Oil States International quarterly revenues of $164.6M. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Oil States International's net income of $15.2M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oil States International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.83x versus 0.47x for Oil States International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Par Pacific Holdings has a net margin of -27.59% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of -3.04%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -11.4% beat Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -2.62%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.73, signalling upside risk potential of 336.87%. On the other hand Par Pacific Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 40.99%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.485, which suggesting that the stock is 148.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.18%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Par Pacific Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Par Pacific Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $109.3M, which are smaller than Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$30.2M is higher than Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$55.7M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Par Pacific Holdings's PE ratio is 2.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.83x versus 0.10x for Par Pacific Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -27.59% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of 0.91%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -11.4% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.73, signalling upside risk potential of 336.87%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.485, which suggesting that the stock is 148.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.193%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $109.3M, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.8B. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $281M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.83x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.