GEOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Drilling Tools International has a net margin of -54.36% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of -3.89%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -11.85% beat Drilling Tools International's return on equity of -1.62%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Drilling Tools International has an analysts' consensus of $3.78 which suggests that it could grow by 16.15%. Given that Drilling Tools International has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Drilling Tools International is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drilling Tools International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Drilling Tools International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Drilling Tools International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $18M, which are smaller than Drilling Tools International quarterly revenues of $42.9M. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Drilling Tools International's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while Drilling Tools International's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.76x versus 0.68x for Drilling Tools International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MRC Global has a net margin of -54.36% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of -3.09%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -11.85% beat MRC Global's return on equity of 1.9%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MRC Global has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that MRC Global has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe MRC Global is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MRC Global has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.66%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MRC Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MRC Global pays out 41.82% of its earnings as a dividend. MRC Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $18M, which are smaller than MRC Global quarterly revenues of $712M. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$9.8M is higher than MRC Global's net income of -$22M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while MRC Global's PE ratio is 40.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.76x versus 0.38x for MRC Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Gas Services Group has a net margin of -54.36% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 11.73%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -11.85% beat Natural Gas Services Group's return on equity of 6.78%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Gas Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.25 which suggests that it could grow by 41.55%. Given that Natural Gas Services Group has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Natural Gas Services Group is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.135%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Gas Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Gas Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $18M, which are smaller than Natural Gas Services Group quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Natural Gas Services Group's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while Natural Gas Services Group's PE ratio is 18.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.76x versus 2.00x for Natural Gas Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NOV has a net margin of -54.36% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 3.47%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -11.85% beat NOV's return on equity of 9.15%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NOV has an analysts' consensus of $16.36 which suggests that it could grow by 19.79%. Given that NOV has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe NOV is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NOV has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.85%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NOV offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV pays out 17.01% of its earnings as a dividend. NOV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $18M, which are smaller than NOV quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$9.8M is lower than NOV's net income of $73M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while NOV's PE ratio is 9.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.76x versus 0.61x for NOV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.