MMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle has a net margin of -3.2% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of 2.64%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -4.92% beat Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.41%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.49%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle has an analysts' consensus of $311.33 which suggests that it could grow by 22.73%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.564%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Jones Lang LaSalle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -59.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $168.5M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$5.4M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $155.1M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle's PE ratio is 25.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 2.34x versus 0.55x for Jones Lang LaSalle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La Rosa Holdings has a net margin of -3.2% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of -12.52%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -4.92% beat La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.49%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marcus & Millichap has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Marcus & Millichap is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. La Rosa Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -59.07% of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $168.5M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$5.4M is lower than La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while La Rosa Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 2.34x versus 0.18x for La Rosa Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group has a net margin of -3.2% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of 2.59%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -4.92% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.49%. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 46.75%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.996, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.575%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -59.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $168.5M, which are smaller than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $685.9M. Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$5.4M is lower than Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 42.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 2.34x versus 1.05x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of -3.2% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of -80.75%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -4.92% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -1.97%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.49%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 82.29%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.663, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.324%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 27.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -59.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out 161.82% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $168.5M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$5.4M is lower than Sachem Capital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 2.34x versus 2.05x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.