NMRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

La Rosa Holdings has a net margin of -1.32% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of -546.5%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 4.51% beat La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 28.79%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.938, which suggesting that the stock is 93.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. La Rosa Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $665.5M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Newmark Group's net income of -$8.8M is higher than La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$95.7M. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.62x while La Rosa Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 0.87x versus 0.03x for La Rosa Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of -1.32% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of -3.05%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 4.51% beat Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.09%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 28.79%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.01%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.938, which suggesting that the stock is 93.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.482%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Marcus & Millichap offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Newmark Group pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $665.5M, which are larger than Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues of $145M. Newmark Group's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.62x while Marcus & Millichap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 0.87x versus 1.69x for Marcus & Millichap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage has a net margin of -1.32% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of -1.4%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 4.51% beat The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -51%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 28.79%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.1%. Given that The Real Brokerage has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, analysts believe The Real Brokerage is more attractive than Newmark Group.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.938, which suggesting that the stock is 93.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. The Real Brokerage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $665.5M, which are larger than The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues of $354M. Newmark Group's net income of -$8.8M is lower than The Real Brokerage's net income of -$5M. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.62x while The Real Brokerage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 0.87x versus 0.56x for The Real Brokerage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of -1.32% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of 29.05%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 4.51% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -20.65%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 28.79%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 72.02%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Newmark Group.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.938, which suggesting that the stock is 93.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.528%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 21.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Newmark Group pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $665.5M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Newmark Group's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Sachem Capital's net income of $904K. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.62x while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 0.87x versus 17.85x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.