REAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

La Rosa Holdings has a net margin of -0.69% compared to The Real Brokerage's net margin of -12.52%. The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -107.32% beat La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78%.

The Real Brokerage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Real Brokerage has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe The Real Brokerage is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.

The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Real Brokerage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. La Rosa Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Real Brokerage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues are $372.5M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues of $19.6M. The Real Brokerage's net income of -$2.6M is lower than La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, The Real Brokerage's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while La Rosa Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage is 0.76x versus 0.18x for La Rosa Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of -0.69% compared to The Real Brokerage's net margin of -3.2%. The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -107.32% beat Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -4.92%.

The Real Brokerage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -20.49%. Given that The Real Brokerage has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe The Real Brokerage is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.255%.

The Real Brokerage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus & Millichap offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. The Real Brokerage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out -59.07% of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues are $372.5M, which are larger than Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues of $168.5M. The Real Brokerage's net income of -$2.6M is higher than Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, The Real Brokerage's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus & Millichap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage is 0.76x versus 2.34x for Marcus & Millichap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group has a net margin of -0.69% compared to The Real Brokerage's net margin of 2.59%. The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -107.32% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43%.

The Real Brokerage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 46.75%. Given that The Real Brokerage has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, analysts believe The Real Brokerage is more attractive than Newmark Group.

The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.996, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.575%.

The Real Brokerage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. The Real Brokerage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues are $372.5M, which are smaller than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $685.9M. The Real Brokerage's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M. Notably, The Real Brokerage's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 42.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage is 0.76x versus 1.05x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of -0.69% compared to The Real Brokerage's net margin of -80.75%. The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -107.32% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -1.97%.

The Real Brokerage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 82.29%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than The Real Brokerage, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than The Real Brokerage.

The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.663, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.324%.

The Real Brokerage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 27.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. The Real Brokerage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out 161.82% of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues are $372.5M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $6.3M. The Real Brokerage's net income of -$2.6M is higher than Sachem Capital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, The Real Brokerage's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage is 0.76x versus 2.05x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.