SACH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

La Rosa Holdings has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Sachem Capital's net margin of -546.5%. Sachem Capital's return on equity of -20.65% beat La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78%.

Sachem Capital has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 90.01%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.

Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sachem Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 29.39%. La Rosa Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sachem Capital pays -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sachem Capital quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Sachem Capital's net income of $904K is higher than La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$95.7M. Notably, Sachem Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.83x while La Rosa Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sachem Capital is 17.85x versus 0.03x for La Rosa Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Sachem Capital's net margin of -3.05%. Sachem Capital's return on equity of -20.65% beat Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.09%.

Sachem Capital has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 90.01%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.13%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.453%.

Sachem Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 29.39%. Marcus & Millichap offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sachem Capital pays -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sachem Capital quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues of $145M. Sachem Capital's net income of $904K is higher than Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Sachem Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.83x while Marcus & Millichap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sachem Capital is 17.85x versus 1.57x for Marcus & Millichap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Sachem Capital's net margin of -1.32%. Sachem Capital's return on equity of -20.65% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 4.51%.

Sachem Capital has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 90.01%. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 35.11%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Newmark Group.

Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.986, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.584%.

Sachem Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 29.39%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sachem Capital pays -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sachem Capital quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $665.5M. Sachem Capital's net income of $904K is higher than Newmark Group's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Sachem Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.83x while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 28.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sachem Capital is 17.85x versus 0.83x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage has a net margin of 29.05% compared to Sachem Capital's net margin of -1.4%. Sachem Capital's return on equity of -20.65% beat The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -51%.

Sachem Capital has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 90.01%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.77%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than The Real Brokerage, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than The Real Brokerage.

Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sachem Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 29.39%. The Real Brokerage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sachem Capital pays -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sachem Capital quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues of $354M. Sachem Capital's net income of $904K is higher than The Real Brokerage's net income of -$5M. Notably, Sachem Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.83x while The Real Brokerage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sachem Capital is 17.85x versus 0.57x for The Real Brokerage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.