LEVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 10.01%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $19.76, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $28.62 which suggests that it could grow by 15.83%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.281%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is higher than Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 9.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.17x versus 0.67x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of -3528.43%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $19.76, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.44%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.17x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PVH has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 6.63%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat PVH's return on equity of 11.6%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $19.76, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand PVH has an analysts' consensus of $100.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.57%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PVH has a beta of 1.808, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.814%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. PVH offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. PVH pays out 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than PVH quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is lower than PVH's net income of $157.2M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while PVH's PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.17x versus 0.57x for PVH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 2.12%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $19.76, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -17.5%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Tesla.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while Tesla's PE ratio is 199.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.17x versus 13.29x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.