IT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 65.17%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $476.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.30 which suggests that it could grow by 53.56%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $75.4M. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.76x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.50x versus 2.04x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXC Technology has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 1.77%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat DXC Technology's return on equity of -2.34%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $476.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand DXC Technology has an analysts' consensus of $20.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.83%. Given that DXC Technology has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe DXC Technology is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXC Technology has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.03%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXC Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXC Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than DXC Technology quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than DXC Technology's net income of $57M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.76x while DXC Technology's PE ratio is 282.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.50x versus 0.23x for DXC Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 8.55%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 29.95%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $476.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $174.34 which suggests that it could grow by 13.9%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.769%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $363M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.76x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 15.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.50x versus 1.22x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 14.49%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $476.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 22.79%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.297%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.76x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 117.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.50x versus 4.38x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.