IT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of --. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $551.81, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $8.45 which suggests that it could grow by 25.54%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Aurora Innovation, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Aurora Innovation.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$193M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.81x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.17x versus 160.18x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of 6.75%. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $551.81, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 61.71%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.81x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 38.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.17x versus 2.01x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of 6.51%. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $551.81, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $171.87 which suggests that it could grow by 27.35%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.933%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.81x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 14.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.17x versus 1.10x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of 9.55%. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $551.81, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.61 which suggests that it could grow by 2.28%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.81x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 445.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.17x versus 72.42x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.