LDOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of --. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $184.38, signalling upside risk potential of 18.82%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $5.85 which suggests that it could fall by -14%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Aurora Innovation, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Aurora Innovation.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.67x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.31x versus 156.83x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 5.04%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 7.51%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $184.38, signalling upside risk potential of 18.82%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.1%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.951%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $70.8M. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.67x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 47.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.31x versus 2.18x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parsons has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 3.98%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Parsons's return on equity of 3.39%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $184.38, signalling upside risk potential of 18.82%. On the other hand Parsons has an analysts' consensus of $116.31 which suggests that it could grow by 22.14%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parsons has a beta of 0.742, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.772%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Parsons offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Parsons pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Parsons quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Parsons's net income of $72M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.67x while Parsons's PE ratio is 144.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.31x versus 1.62x for Parsons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 5.36%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 17.6%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $184.38, signalling upside risk potential of 18.82%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $130.11 which suggests that it could grow by 12.29%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.458%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Leidos Holdings's is not.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $2B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Science Applications International's net income of $106M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.67x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.31x versus 0.81x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.