IBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 2.9%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $253.27, signalling downside risk potential of -8.32%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 50.21%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.946%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.55x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 101.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 4.12x versus 2.73x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ibotta has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 0.66%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Ibotta's return on equity of 18.29%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $253.27, signalling downside risk potential of -8.32%. On the other hand Ibotta has an analysts' consensus of $60.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.28%. Given that Ibotta has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Ibotta is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibotta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Ibotta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ibotta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Ibotta quarterly revenues of $84.6M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Ibotta's net income of $555K. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.55x while Ibotta's PE ratio is 31.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 4.12x versus 3.88x for Ibotta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pagaya Technologies has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 2.79%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -67.28%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $253.27, signalling downside risk potential of -8.32%. On the other hand Pagaya Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.58 which suggests that it could grow by 25.53%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Pagaya Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Pagaya Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues of $282.7M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Pagaya Technologies's net income of $7.9M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.55x while Pagaya Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 4.12x versus 1.27x for Pagaya Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 24.22%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $253.27, signalling downside risk potential of -8.32%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $100.19 which suggests that it could fall by -24.56%. Given that Palantir Technologies has more downside risk than International Business Machines, analysts believe International Business Machines is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.55x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 577.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 4.12x versus 106.12x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.