IBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Digimarc has a net margin of -2.21% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of -113.88%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 27.17% beat Digimarc's return on equity of -56.45%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $217.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand Digimarc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.42%. Given that Digimarc has more downside risk than International Business Machines, analysts believe International Business Machines is more attractive than Digimarc.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digimarc has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.742%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Digimarc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 80.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Digimarc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Digimarc quarterly revenues of $9.4M. International Business Machines's net income of -$330M is lower than Digimarc's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while Digimarc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.27x versus 21.72x for Digimarc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HashiCorp has a net margin of -2.21% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of -7.5%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 27.17% beat HashiCorp's return on equity of -10.01%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $217.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand HashiCorp has an analysts' consensus of $34.86 which suggests that it could grow by 2.01%. Given that HashiCorp has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe HashiCorp is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HashiCorp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. HashiCorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 80.51% of its earnings as a dividend. HashiCorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than HashiCorp quarterly revenues of $173.4M. International Business Machines's net income of -$330M is lower than HashiCorp's net income of -$13M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while HashiCorp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.27x versus 10.47x for HashiCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ibotta has a net margin of -2.21% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 17.48%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 27.17% beat Ibotta's return on equity of 5.54%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $217.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand Ibotta has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.17%. Given that Ibotta has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Ibotta is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibotta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Ibotta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 80.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Ibotta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Ibotta quarterly revenues of $98.6M. International Business Machines's net income of -$330M is lower than Ibotta's net income of $17.2M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while Ibotta's PE ratio is 584.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.27x versus 5.41x for Ibotta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -2.21% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 19.78%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 27.17% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.27%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $217.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $39.57 which suggests that it could fall by -41.62%. Given that Palantir Technologies has more downside risk than International Business Machines, analysts believe International Business Machines is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 80.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $725.5M. International Business Machines's net income of -$330M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $143.5M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 375.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.27x versus 68.35x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.