IBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 2.9%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $251.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.61%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could grow by 48.16%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.695%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.61x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 111.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.78x versus 3.00x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ibotta has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 77.43%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Ibotta's return on equity of 27.13%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $251.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.61%. On the other hand Ibotta has an analysts' consensus of $50.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.92%. Given that Ibotta has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Ibotta is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibotta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. Ibotta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ibotta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Ibotta quarterly revenues of $98.4M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Ibotta's net income of $76.2M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.61x while Ibotta's PE ratio is 26.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.78x versus 3.85x for Ibotta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 8.55%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 29.95%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $251.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.61%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $172.81 which suggests that it could grow by 11.69%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.769%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Business Machines's is not.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Leidos Holdings's net income of $363M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.61x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 15.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.78x versus 1.23x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 24.22%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $251.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.61%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $94.23 which suggests that it could fall by -14.92%. Given that Palantir Technologies has more downside risk than International Business Machines, analysts believe International Business Machines is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.61x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 480.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.78x versus 88.28x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.