VRRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -114.15%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 19.94%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 432800.35%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 120.55x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.48x versus 0.02x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of --. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 19.94%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 70.89%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 120.55x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.48x versus 151.06x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of 65.17%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 19.94%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.30 which suggests that it could grow by 43.36%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $75.4M. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is lower than Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 120.55x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 10.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.48x versus 2.18x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -65748.98%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 19.94%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Veea.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $14.3K. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is higher than Veea's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 120.55x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.48x versus 491.58x for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.