FUL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 6.03% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of -0.63%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 10.28% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.435, which suggesting that the stock is 43.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 29.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $917.9M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. H.B. Fuller's net income of $55.4M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.50x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 1.01x versus 0.22x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 6.03% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 1.61%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 10.28% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.435, which suggesting that the stock is 43.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.032%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 29.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $917.9M, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. H.B. Fuller's net income of $55.4M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.50x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 1.01x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 6.03% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 10.28% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 233.33%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.435, which suggesting that the stock is 43.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 29.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $917.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $55.4M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.50x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 1.01x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 6.03% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 10.28% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 147.77%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.435, which suggesting that the stock is 43.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 29.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $917.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $55.4M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.50x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 1.01x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.