FUL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of -1.23%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $63.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.675%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.39x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.87x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 0.93%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $63.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $79.67 which suggests that it could grow by 28.31%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.517%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.39x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 21.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.87x versus 0.34x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $63.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 272.34%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.39x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.87x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $63.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.92%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.39x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.87x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.