FRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor has a net margin of -0.63% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of 3.36%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.71 which suggests that it could grow by 27.46%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.118% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $106.8M, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.21x versus 0.94x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radius Recycling has a net margin of -0.63% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of -5.66%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32% beat Radius Recycling's return on equity of -39.82%.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Radius Recycling has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.12%. Given that Radius Recycling has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Radius Recycling is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.118% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radius Recycling has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.106%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Radius Recycling offers a yield of 6.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Radius Recycling pays out -8.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $106.8M, which are smaller than Radius Recycling quarterly revenues of $656.5M. Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K is higher than Radius Recycling's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while Radius Recycling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.21x versus 0.13x for Radius Recycling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -0.63% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of 5.35%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $138.87 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.118% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $106.8M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.21x versus 1.09x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a net margin of -0.63% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of 12.67%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32% beat Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's return on equity of 11.36%.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.25%. Given that Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Universal Stainless & Alloy Products is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, which suggesting that the stock is 41.118% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.064%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $106.8M, which are larger than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products quarterly revenues of $87.3M. Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K is lower than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net income of $11.1M. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's PE ratio is 16.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.21x versus 1.33x for Universal Stainless & Alloy Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.