DDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -39.12% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -34.78%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -103.2% beat GoPro's return on equity of -81.81%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $0.50 which suggests that it could fall by -43.24%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than GoPro.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.693%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $134.3M. 3D Systems's net income of -$37M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$46.7M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.59x versus 0.17x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -39.12% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 3.26%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -103.2% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 55.06%. Given that Immersion has higher upside potential than 3D Systems, analysts believe Immersion is more attractive than 3D Systems.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.826%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. 3D Systems's net income of -$37M is lower than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.59x versus 0.21x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -39.12% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -9.6%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -103.2% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.45%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Stratasys.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.672%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $136M. 3D Systems's net income of -$37M is lower than Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.59x versus 1.32x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -39.12% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 0.15%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -103.2% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -24.88%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.63%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Transact Technologies, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Transact Technologies.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.84%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $13.1M. 3D Systems's net income of -$37M is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of $19K. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.59x versus 0.75x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.