DDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -3.17%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat GoPro's return on equity of -116.34%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.13%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.62%. Given that GoPro has higher upside potential than 3D Systems, analysts believe GoPro is more attractive than 3D Systems.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.372%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $258.9M. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than GoPro's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 1.01x versus 0.19x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 4.41%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat Immersion's return on equity of 31.03%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.13%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $13.75 which suggests that it could grow by 52.78%. Given that Immersion has higher upside potential than 3D Systems, analysts believe Immersion is more attractive than 3D Systems.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.104%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $616.2M. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than Immersion's net income of $27.2M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Immersion's PE ratio is 3.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 1.01x versus 0.38x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Juniper Networks has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 6.96%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat Juniper Networks's return on equity of 5.57%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.13%. On the other hand Juniper Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.84%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.675%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Juniper Networks offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks pays out 90.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are smaller than Juniper Networks quarterly revenues of $1.3B. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than Juniper Networks's net income of $92.6M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Juniper Networks's PE ratio is 49.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 1.01x versus 2.45x for Juniper Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -5.07%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -5.07%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.13%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 63.04%. Given that Transact Technologies has higher upside potential than 3D Systems, analysts believe Transact Technologies is more attractive than 3D Systems.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.731, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.063%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.9M. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of -$551K. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 77.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 1.01x versus 0.89x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.