IMMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

3D Systems has a net margin of 4.41% compared to Immersion's net margin of -158.16%. Immersion's return on equity of 31.03% beat 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98%.

Immersion has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand 3D Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.13%. Given that Immersion has higher upside potential than 3D Systems, analysts believe Immersion is more attractive than 3D Systems.

Immersion has a beta of 1.511, which suggesting that the stock is 51.104% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 3D Systems has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.102%.

Immersion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. 3D Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Immersion pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. 3D Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Immersion quarterly revenues are $616.2M, which are larger than 3D Systems quarterly revenues of $112.9M. Immersion's net income of $27.2M is higher than 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M. Notably, Immersion's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.21x while 3D Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immersion is 0.38x versus 1.01x for 3D Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GoPro has a net margin of 4.41% compared to Immersion's net margin of -3.17%. Immersion's return on equity of 31.03% beat GoPro's return on equity of -116.34%.

Immersion has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.62%. Given that Immersion has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe Immersion is more attractive than GoPro.

Immersion has a beta of 1.511, which suggesting that the stock is 51.104% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.372%.

Immersion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Immersion pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Immersion quarterly revenues are $616.2M, which are larger than GoPro quarterly revenues of $258.9M. Immersion's net income of $27.2M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Immersion's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.21x while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immersion is 0.38x versus 0.19x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Juniper Networks has a net margin of 4.41% compared to Immersion's net margin of 6.96%. Immersion's return on equity of 31.03% beat Juniper Networks's return on equity of 5.57%.

Immersion has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand Juniper Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.84%. Given that Immersion has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe Immersion is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

Immersion has a beta of 1.511, which suggesting that the stock is 51.104% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.675%.

Immersion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Juniper Networks offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Immersion pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks pays out 90.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Immersion quarterly revenues are $616.2M, which are smaller than Juniper Networks quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Immersion's net income of $27.2M is lower than Juniper Networks's net income of $92.6M. Notably, Immersion's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.21x while Juniper Networks's PE ratio is 49.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immersion is 0.38x versus 2.45x for Juniper Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of 4.41% compared to Immersion's net margin of -5.07%. Immersion's return on equity of 31.03% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -5.07%.

Immersion has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 63.04%. Given that Transact Technologies has higher upside potential than Immersion, analysts believe Transact Technologies is more attractive than Immersion.

Immersion has a beta of 1.511, which suggesting that the stock is 51.104% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.731, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.063%.

Immersion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Immersion pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Immersion quarterly revenues are $616.2M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.9M. Immersion's net income of $27.2M is higher than Transact Technologies's net income of -$551K. Notably, Immersion's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.21x while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 77.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immersion is 0.38x versus 0.89x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.