ALOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -1% compared to AstroNova's net margin of -34.78%. AstroNova's return on equity of -18.77% beat GoPro's return on equity of -81.81%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $0.50 which suggests that it could fall by -43.24%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than GoPro.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.693%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.7M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $134.3M. AstroNova's net income of -$376K is higher than GoPro's net income of -$46.7M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.44x versus 0.17x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -1% compared to AstroNova's net margin of 3.26%. AstroNova's return on equity of -18.77% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 55.06%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Immersion, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Immersion.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.826%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.7M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. AstroNova's net income of -$376K is lower than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.44x versus 0.21x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Juniper Networks has a net margin of -1% compared to AstroNova's net margin of 5.01%. AstroNova's return on equity of -18.77% beat Juniper Networks's return on equity of 7.59%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Juniper Networks has an analysts' consensus of $39.89 which suggests that it could grow by 10.74%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.471%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Juniper Networks offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks pays out 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.7M, which are smaller than Juniper Networks quarterly revenues of $1.3B. AstroNova's net income of -$376K is lower than Juniper Networks's net income of $64.1M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Juniper Networks's PE ratio is 34.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.44x versus 2.33x for Juniper Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -1% compared to AstroNova's net margin of 0.15%. AstroNova's return on equity of -18.77% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -24.88%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.63%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Transact Technologies, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Transact Technologies.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.84%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.7M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $13.1M. AstroNova's net income of -$376K is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of $19K. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.44x versus 0.75x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.