SSYS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Key Tronic has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -0.54%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Key Tronic's return on equity of -5.17%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.04%. On the other hand Key Tronic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 199.35%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Key Tronic has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.32799999999999%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Key Tronic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Key Tronic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Key Tronic quarterly revenues of $112M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is lower than Key Tronic's net income of -$604K. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Key Tronic's PE ratio is 214.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.36x versus 0.07x for Key Tronic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -10.37%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -46%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.04%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $84.44 which suggests that it could grow by 7.74%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.677%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $425.2M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.36x versus 3.65x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -1418.91%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.04%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 110.97%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.637, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.334%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is higher than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.36x versus 40.04x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -9.6% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -6726.52%. Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -99.09%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.04%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $14.80 which suggests that it could grow by 4.3%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of $42.6M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.36x versus 342.25x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.