KTCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Qualcomm has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of 25.61%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -5.17% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.46%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 207.31%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $173.79 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Qualcomm, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Qualcomm.

Key Tronic has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.865%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $112M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $11B. Key Tronic's net income of -$604K is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 214.00x while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 15.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.07x versus 3.93x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of -1418.91%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -5.17% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 207.31%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 117.51%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Key Tronic has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.637, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.334%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $112M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Key Tronic's net income of -$604K is higher than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 214.00x while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.07x versus 38.83x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of -6726.52%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -5.17% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -99.09%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 207.31%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $14.80 which suggests that it could grow by 4.52%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

Key Tronic has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $112M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Key Tronic's net income of -$604K is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of $42.6M. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 214.00x while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.07x versus 341.53x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of -9.6%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -5.17% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 207.31%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.11%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Stratasys.

Key Tronic has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.499, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.871%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $112M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $136M. Key Tronic's net income of -$604K is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 214.00x while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.07x versus 1.35x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.