CVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of -7.47% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -6.54%. CVR Energy's return on equity of -21.31% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -88.27%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.49%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.79 which suggests that it could fall by -17.98%. Given that Delek US Holdings has more downside risk than CVR Energy, analysts believe CVR Energy is more attractive than Delek US Holdings.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.581%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.8%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. CVR Energy's net income of -$123M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$172.7M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 324.67x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.32x versus 0.11x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of -7.47% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -5.69%. CVR Energy's return on equity of -21.31% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -17.4%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.49%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $18.54 which suggests that it could fall by -2.69%. Given that CVR Energy has more downside risk than PBF Energy, analysts believe PBF Energy is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.664%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.8%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 5.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $7.1B. CVR Energy's net income of -$123M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$401.8M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 324.67x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.32x versus 0.07x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -7.47% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of 1.6%. CVR Energy's return on equity of -21.31% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.49%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $130.97 which suggests that it could grow by 15.41%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.8%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Energy's is not.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. CVR Energy's net income of -$123M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 324.67x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.32x versus 0.34x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -7.47% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -1.97%. CVR Energy's return on equity of -21.31% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.49%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $144.62 which suggests that it could grow by 12.14%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.044%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.8%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Energy's is not.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. CVR Energy's net income of -$123M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 324.67x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 45.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.32x versus 0.32x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.