CVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -17.43%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -62.29%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.32%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.92 which suggests that it could grow by 22.24%. Given that Delek US Holdings has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Delek US Holdings is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.216%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.41%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 6.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.4B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$413.8M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 320.33x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.25x versus 0.08x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -3.91%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.39%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.32%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 65.38%. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.770, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.01%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.41%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 33.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.5B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$98M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 320.33x while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.25x versus 0.43x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -3.94%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -8.52%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.32%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $23.23 which suggests that it could grow by 24.11%. Given that PBF Energy has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe PBF Energy is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 1.146, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.599%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.41%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 5.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $7.4B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$289.3M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 320.33x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.25x versus 0.07x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of 0.02%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.32%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $139.44 which suggests that it could grow by 12.93%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.493%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.41%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Energy's is not.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 320.33x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.25x versus 0.36x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.