CARS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Openlane has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 10.63%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.7% beat Openlane's return on equity of 8.26%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.75%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $23.43 which suggests that it could grow by 22.22%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Openlane.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.952, which suggesting that the stock is 95.174% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.625%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are smaller than Openlane quarterly revenues of $492M. Cars.com's net income of $17.3M is lower than Openlane's net income of $52.3M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Openlane's PE ratio is 42.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.06x versus 1.17x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Cars.com's net margin of -5.37%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.7% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -46.15%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.75%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -55.56%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.952, which suggesting that the stock is 95.174% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.603%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $30.2M. Cars.com's net income of $17.3M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.06x versus 2.17x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 1.5%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.7% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.75%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $83.88 which suggests that it could grow by 27.33%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than CarMax.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.952, which suggesting that the stock is 95.174% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.765%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Cars.com's net income of $17.3M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while CarMax's PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.06x versus 0.39x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prestige Cars International has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Cars.com's net margin of --. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.7% beat Prestige Cars International's return on equity of --.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 57.75%. On the other hand Prestige Cars International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Prestige Cars International, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Prestige Cars International.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.952, which suggesting that the stock is 95.174% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prestige Cars International has a beta of 2.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.159%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prestige Cars International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prestige Cars International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $180.4M, which are larger than Prestige Cars International quarterly revenues of --. Cars.com's net income of $17.3M is higher than Prestige Cars International's net income of --. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Prestige Cars International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.06x versus -- for Prestige Cars International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.