BALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of 6.79%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of $40.77 which suggests that it could grow by 26.26%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.974%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Ball's net income of $197M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $234M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.09x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.23x versus 0.52x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of -5.69%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $107.82 which suggests that it could grow by 26.02%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.033%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Ball's net income of $197M is higher than Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.09x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 105.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.23x versus 0.87x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of 5.73%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 15.47%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Ball has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.747%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Ball's net income of $197M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $100.1M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.09x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.23x versus 0.97x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of 8.61%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.53 which suggests that it could fall by -28.6%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Tesla.

Ball has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Ball's net income of $197M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.09x while Tesla's PE ratio is 116.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.23x versus 15.32x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.