BALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of 1.16%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.76, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.37 which suggests that it could grow by 3.93%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ball has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.843%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Ball's net income of $179M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 7.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.30x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of -4.88%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.76, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.58 which suggests that it could grow by 26.95%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.573%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.30x versus 1.16x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of -43.95%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.76, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could grow by 4.44%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Ball has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.30x versus 2.96x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of 4.63%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.52%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.76, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $60.24 which suggests that it could grow by 11.72%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Ball has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.856%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $68M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 20.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.30x versus 0.96x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.