CCK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Global Group has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 0.59%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat Berry Global Group's return on equity of 14.9%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 20.5%. On the other hand Berry Global Group has an analysts' consensus of $74.89 which suggests that it could grow by 6.17%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.354% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.042%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Berry Global Group offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group pays out 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Berry Global Group quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than Berry Global Group's net income of $14M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.34x while Berry Global Group's PE ratio is 17.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.91x versus 0.70x for Berry Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Paper has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of -3.21%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat International Paper's return on equity of 6.63%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 20.5%. On the other hand International Paper has an analysts' consensus of $57.87 which suggests that it could grow by 7.86%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than International Paper, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than International Paper.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.354% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Paper has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.169%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. International Paper offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. International Paper pays out 115.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Paper's is not.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than International Paper quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than International Paper's net income of -$147M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.34x while International Paper's PE ratio is 34.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.91x versus 1.02x for International Paper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Packaging Corp of America has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 10.3%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 19.33%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 20.5%. On the other hand Packaging Corp of America has an analysts' consensus of $228.70 which suggests that it could grow by 15.49%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.354% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.968%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Packaging Corp of America offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America pays out 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than Packaging Corp of America's net income of $221.1M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.34x while Packaging Corp of America's PE ratio is 22.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.91x versus 2.11x for Packaging Corp of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 3.19%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.15%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 20.5%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $62.20 which suggests that it could grow by 21.68%. Given that Silgan Holdings has higher upside potential than Crown Holdings, analysts believe Silgan Holdings is more attractive than Crown Holdings.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.354% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.491%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $45.1M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.34x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.91x versus 0.94x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.