CCK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Global Group has a net margin of -5.69% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 4.67%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.82, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand Berry Global Group has an analysts' consensus of $74.07 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.232%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Berry Global Group offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Crown Holdings pays 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group pays out 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Berry Global Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M is lower than Berry Global Group's net income of $148M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.63x while Berry Global Group's PE ratio is 15.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.65x for Berry Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -5.69% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of --. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.82, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.61%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.703%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crown Holdings pays 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.63x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.87x versus 237.68x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -5.69% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of --. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.82, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Northann.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crown Holdings pays 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.63x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.57x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of -5.69% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 5.73%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 15.47%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.82, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.747%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Crown Holdings pays 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M is lower than Silgan Holdings's net income of $100.1M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.63x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.97x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.