LEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crocs has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of 37.27%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -54.14% beat Crocs's return on equity of 57.48%.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of $11.67, signalling upside risk potential of 36.13%. On the other hand Crocs has an analysts' consensus of $129.26 which suggests that it could grow by 16.53%. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than Crocs.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs has a beta of 1.837, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.697%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Crocs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Crocs quarterly revenues of $989.8M. Leggett & Platt's net income of $14.2M is lower than Crocs's net income of $368.9M. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crocs's PE ratio is 6.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.27x versus 1.62x for Crocs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mohawk Industries has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of 3.53%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -54.14% beat Mohawk Industries's return on equity of 6.75%.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of $11.67, signalling upside risk potential of 36.13%. On the other hand Mohawk Industries has an analysts' consensus of $144.13 which suggests that it could grow by 23.72%. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than Mohawk Industries, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than Mohawk Industries.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.09%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Mohawk Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Mohawk Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Mohawk Industries quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Leggett & Platt's net income of $14.2M is lower than Mohawk Industries's net income of $93.2M. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mohawk Industries's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.27x versus 0.68x for Mohawk Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of --. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -54.14% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of $11.67, signalling upside risk potential of 36.13%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than Northann.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Leggett & Platt's net income of $14.2M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.27x versus 0.38x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of 5.92%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -54.14% beat VF's return on equity of -27.74%.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of $11.67, signalling upside risk potential of 36.13%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $26.27 which suggests that it could grow by 54.52%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Leggett & Platt, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Leggett & Platt.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.935%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. VF offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Leggett & Platt's net income of $14.2M is lower than VF's net income of $167.8M. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.27x versus 0.65x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.