MYND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.ai's net margin of 3.46%. Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98%.

Mynd.ai has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.51%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.941%.

Mynd.ai has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mynd.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mynd.ai quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $114.4M. Mynd.ai's net income of -- is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M. Notably, Mynd.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 46.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.ai is 0.23x versus 1.09x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.ai's net margin of 17.4%. Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 30.82%.

Mynd.ai has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.73%. Given that Grand Canyon Education has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Grand Canyon Education is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.275%.

Mynd.ai has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mynd.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mynd.ai quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $238.3M. Mynd.ai's net income of -- is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $41.5M. Notably, Mynd.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.ai is 0.23x versus 4.74x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.ai's net margin of --. Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39% beat NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's return on equity of --.

Mynd.ai has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mynd.ai has higher upside potential than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group, analysts believe Mynd.ai is more attractive than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group.

Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mynd.ai has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mynd.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mynd.ai quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group quarterly revenues of --. Mynd.ai's net income of -- is lower than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's net income of -$1.6K. Notably, Mynd.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.ai is 0.23x versus 14.07x for NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.ai's net margin of 22.53%. Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 15.25%.

Mynd.ai has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.3%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.262%.

Mynd.ai has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mynd.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 9.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mynd.ai quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Mynd.ai's net income of -- is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $38.3M. Notably, Mynd.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.ai is 0.23x versus 2.71x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.