LINC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of --. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98% beat EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.87%. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 138.1%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues of --. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of --. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.69x while EpicQuest Education Group International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.08x versus 1.89x for EpicQuest Education Group International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of 14.21%. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 31.18%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.87%. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.07%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.575%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are larger than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $84.1M. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M is lower than Franklin Covey's net income of $12M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.69x while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 20.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.08x versus 1.65x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of 23.18%. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 26.25%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.87%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $20.33 which suggests that it could grow by 11.23%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.726%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 104.54% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $368.6M. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M is lower than Laureate Education's net income of $85.5M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.69x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 11.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.08x versus 1.83x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Technical Institute has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of 9.6%. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98% beat Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 17.79%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.87%. On the other hand Universal Technical Institute has an analysts' consensus of $26.60 which suggests that it could grow by 3.38%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.293%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Technical Institute offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute pays out 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are smaller than Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues of $196.4M. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M is lower than Universal Technical Institute's net income of $18.8M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.69x while Universal Technical Institute's PE ratio is 34.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.08x versus 1.79x for Universal Technical Institute. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.