LOPE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 24.76% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 13.05%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 16.71%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $217.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.06%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $141.25 which suggests that it could grow by 14.92%. Given that Grand Canyon Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Grand Canyon Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.61%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $289.3M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $466.1M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M is higher than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $60.8M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 5.14x versus 2.72x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of 24.76% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of -8.26%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $217.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.06%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.46%. Given that Grand Canyon Education has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Grand Canyon Education is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.958%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $289.3M, which are larger than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M is higher than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 11.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 5.14x versus 2.23x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 24.76% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 20.51%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $217.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.06%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.95%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.017%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $289.3M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $213M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M is higher than Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 14.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 5.14x versus 2.94x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 24.76% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 9.8%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $217.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.06%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $102.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.12%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.677%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $289.3M, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $303.6M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M is higher than Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 5.14x versus 1.65x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.