STRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 13.05%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 16.71%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 12.54%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $141.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.98%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.332%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $466.1M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $60.8M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 22.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.79x versus 2.93x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 1.65%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 12.54%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.212%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 61.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.79x versus 1.62x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 24.76%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 12.54%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $217.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.85%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.132%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are larger than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $289.3M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 24.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.79x versus 5.47x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 20.51%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 12.54%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Perdoceo Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Perdoceo Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.162%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $213M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 15.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.79x versus 3.15x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.