GHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of 3.46%. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 5.74% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $625.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.57%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.51%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Graham Holdings, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Graham Holdings.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.941%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graham Holdings pays 15.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $114.4M. Graham Holdings's net income of $72.5M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 46.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.82x versus 1.09x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of --. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 5.74% beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $625.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.57%. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graham Holdings has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Graham Holdings is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.993%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Graham Holdings pays 15.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Graham Holdings's net income of $72.5M is higher than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.82x versus 0.23x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of --. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 5.74% beat NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's return on equity of --.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $625.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.57%. On the other hand NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graham Holdings has higher upside potential than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group, analysts believe Graham Holdings is more attractive than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graham Holdings pays 15.08% of its earnings as a dividend. NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group quarterly revenues of --. Graham Holdings's net income of $72.5M is higher than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's net income of -$1.6K. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.82x versus 14.07x for NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of 22.53%. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 5.74% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 15.25%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $625.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.57%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.3%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Graham Holdings, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Graham Holdings.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.262%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Graham Holdings pays 15.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 9.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Graham Holdings's net income of $72.5M is higher than Perdoceo Education's net income of $38.3M. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.82x versus 2.71x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.