RMBL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 2.33%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 77.52%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $463.88 which suggests that it could grow by 9.45%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

RumbleON has a beta of 1.752, which suggesting that the stock is 75.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.147%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.04x versus 0.27x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of -11.23%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 77.52%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.21%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

RumbleON has a beta of 1.752, which suggesting that the stock is 75.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.603%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.7M. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.04x versus 3.08x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 1.5%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 77.52%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.13 which suggests that it could grow by 33.54%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than CarMax.

RumbleON has a beta of 1.752, which suggesting that the stock is 75.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.765%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CarMax's PE ratio is 19.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.04x versus 0.37x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LKQ has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 4.88%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat LKQ's return on equity of 11.38%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 77.52%. On the other hand LKQ has an analysts' consensus of $52.53 which suggests that it could grow by 30.41%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than LKQ, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than LKQ.

RumbleON has a beta of 1.752, which suggesting that the stock is 75.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LKQ has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.004%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LKQ offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ pays out 46.09% of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than LKQ quarterly revenues of $3.5B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than LKQ's net income of $169M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LKQ's PE ratio is 15.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.04x versus 0.75x for LKQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.