LKQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 4.88% compared to LKQ's net margin of 2.33%. LKQ's return on equity of 11.38% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4%.

LKQ has a consensus price target of $52.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.8%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $463.88 which suggests that it could grow by 9.18%. Given that LKQ has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe LKQ is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

LKQ has a beta of 0.981, which suggesting that the stock is 1.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.572%.

LKQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. LKQ pays 46.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LKQ quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. LKQ's net income of $169M is higher than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M. Notably, LKQ's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LKQ is 0.71x versus 0.27x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 4.88% compared to LKQ's net margin of -11.23%. LKQ's return on equity of 11.38% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41%.

LKQ has a consensus price target of $52.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.8%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.59%. Given that LKQ has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe LKQ is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

LKQ has a beta of 0.981, which suggesting that the stock is 1.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.352%.

LKQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LKQ pays 46.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LKQ quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.7M. LKQ's net income of $169M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, LKQ's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LKQ is 0.71x versus 3.23x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 4.88% compared to LKQ's net margin of 1.5%. LKQ's return on equity of 11.38% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

LKQ has a consensus price target of $52.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.8%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.13 which suggests that it could grow by 29.61%. Given that LKQ has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe LKQ is more attractive than CarMax.

LKQ has a beta of 0.981, which suggesting that the stock is 1.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.380, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.989%.

LKQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LKQ pays 46.09% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LKQ quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. LKQ's net income of $169M is higher than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, LKQ's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while CarMax's PE ratio is 20.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LKQ is 0.71x versus 0.38x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RumbleON has a net margin of 4.88% compared to LKQ's net margin of -3.8%. LKQ's return on equity of 11.38% beat RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32%.

LKQ has a consensus price target of $52.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.8%. On the other hand RumbleON has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.64%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than LKQ, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than LKQ.

LKQ has a beta of 0.981, which suggesting that the stock is 1.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RumbleON has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.354%.

LKQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. RumbleON offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LKQ pays 46.09% of its earnings as a dividend. RumbleON pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LKQ quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than RumbleON quarterly revenues of $295M. LKQ's net income of $169M is higher than RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, LKQ's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while RumbleON's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LKQ is 0.71x versus 0.05x for RumbleON. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.